Share
Army networks, select programs are utilizing competition to varying degrees: report to the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on (in English)
U. S. Government Accountability Office
(Author)
·
Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
· Paperback
Army networks, select programs are utilizing competition to varying degrees: report to the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on (in English) - Office, U. S. Government Accountability
$ 11.99
$ 14.99
You save: $ 3.00
Choose the list to add your product or create one New List
✓ Product added successfully to the Wishlist.
Go to My WishlistsIt will be shipped from our warehouse between
Monday, June 17 and
Tuesday, June 18.
You will receive it anywhere in United States between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.
Synopsis "Army networks, select programs are utilizing competition to varying degrees: report to the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on (in English)"
" For nearly 20 years, the Army has had limited success in developing an information network-sensors, software, and radios-to give soldiers the exact information they need, when they need it, in any environment. The Army has declared its tactical network as its top modernization priority and estimated the modernization may cost up to $3 billion per year into the foreseeable future. The Army's current modernization approach is intended to leverage solutions developed by private industry. Given the costs and importance of the network, GAO was asked to examine aspects of the Army's effort to acquire network capabilities. This is the third report in response to the Subcommittee's requests. In this report, GAO examines the Army's progress in implementing competitive strategies for tactical networking systems. GAO selected a non-generalizable sample of 9 of these 25 systems that the Army indicated are critical for ensuring soldiers are able to send and receive mission-critical information between units, and that cover the breadth of warfighter operations. GAO reviewed acquisition strategies for evidence that the Army was seeking competition. "
