menu

0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional
portada Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (in English)
Type
Physical Book
Language
Inglés
Pages
288
Format
Paperback
Dimensions
22.9 x 15.2 x 1.5 cm
Weight
0.38 kg.
ISBN13
9780700636075

Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (in English)

Louis Fisher (Author) · University Press of Kansas · Paperback

Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (in English) - Fisher, Louis

Physical Book

$ 34.27

$ 42.84

You save: $ 8.57

20% discount
  • Condition: New
It will be shipped from our warehouse between Thursday, June 20 and Friday, June 21.
You will receive it anywhere in United States between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.

Synopsis "Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court Is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (in English)"

Federal judges, legal scholars, pundits, and reporters frequently describe the Supreme Court as the final word on the meaning of the Constitution. The historical record presents an entirely different picture. A close and revealing reading of that record, from 1789 to the present day, Reconsidering Judicial Finality reminds us of the "unalterable fact," as Chief Justice Rehnquist once remarked, "that our judicial system, like the human beings who administer it, is fallible." And a Court inevitably prone to miscalculation and error, as this book clearly demonstrates, cannot have the incontrovertible last word on constitutional questions.In this deeply researched, sharply reasoned work of legal myth-busting, constitutional scholar Louis Fisher explains how constitutional disputes are settled by all three branches of government, and by the general public, with the Supreme Court often playing a secondary role. The Court's decisions have, of course, been challenged and reversed in numerous cases--involving slavery, civil rights, child labor legislation, Japanese internment during World War II, abortion, and religious liberty. What Fisher shows us on a case-by-case basis is how the elected branches, scholars, and American public regularly press policies contrary to Court rulings--and regularly prevail, although the process might sometimes take decades. From the common misreading of Marbury v. Madison, to the mistaken understanding of the Supreme Court as the trusted guardian of individual rights, to the questionable assumptions of the Court's decision in Citizens United, Fisher's work charts the distance and the difference between the Court as the ultimate arbiter in constitutional matters and the judgment of history.The verdict of Reconsidering Judicial Finality is clear: to treat the Supreme Court's nine justices as democracy's last hope or as dangerous activists undermining democracy is to vest them with undue significance. The Constitution belongs to all three branches of government--and, finally, to the American people.

Customers reviews

More customer reviews
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)

Frequently Asked Questions about the Book

All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Paperback.

Questions and Answers about the Book

Do you have a question about the book? Login to be able to add your own question.

Opinions about Bookdelivery

More customer reviews