Libros importados con hasta 50% OFF + Envío Gratis a todo USA  Ver más

menu

0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional
portada Revolution by Judiciary: The Structure of American Constitutional law (in English)
Type
Physical Book
Year
2005
Language
English
Pages
241
Format
Hardcover
Weight
1.20
ISBN
0674017153
ISBN13
9780674017153
Categories

Revolution by Judiciary: The Structure of American Constitutional law (in English)

Jed Rubenfeld (Author) · Harvard University Press · Hardcover

Revolution by Judiciary: The Structure of American Constitutional law (in English) - Jed Rubenfeld

New Book

$ 60.00

$ 75.00

You save: $ 15.00

20% discount
  • Condition: New
It will be shipped from our warehouse between Wednesday, June 26 and Friday, June 28.
You will receive it anywhere in United States between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.

Synopsis "Revolution by Judiciary: The Structure of American Constitutional law (in English)"

Although constitutional law is supposed to be fixed and enduring, its central narrative in the twentieth century has been one of radical reinterpretation--Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, Bush v. Gore. What, if anything, justifies such radical reinterpretation? How does it work doctrinally? What, if anything, structures it or limits it? Jed Rubenfeld finds a pattern in American constitutional interpretation that answers these questions convincingly. He posits two different understandings of how constitutional rights would apply or not apply to particular legislation. One is that a right would be violated if certain laws were passed. The other is that a right would not be violated. He calls the former "Application Understandings" and the latter "No-Application Understandings." He finds that constitutional law has almost always adhered to all of the original Application Understandings, but where it has departed from history, as it did in the Brown decision, it has departed from No-Application Understandings. Specifically, the Fourteenth Amendment did not prohibit racial segregation, so Rubenfeld argues that the Supreme Court had no problem reinterpreting it to prohibit it. It was a No-Application Understanding. This is a powerful argument that challenges current theories of constitutional interpretation from Bork to Dworkin. It rejects simplistic originalism, but restores historicity to constitutional theorizing.

Customers reviews

More customer reviews
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)
  • 0% (0)

Frequently Asked Questions about the Book

All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Hardcover.

Questions and Answers about the Book

Do you have a question about the book? Login to be able to add your own question.

Opinions about Bookdelivery

More customer reviews